Have You Played At A Live Web Cam Casino?

Posted by:  :  Category: Camping Gear

By Dan Roberts II

Have you tried playing your favorite casino games at a live web cam casino? If your answer is no, you re most definitely missing out on a lot. There are lots of things that can be gained by playing at a live web cam casino. The webcam feature definitely amps up your already exciting casino games. Back when the webcam feature hasn t been invented, online casino gaming somehow felt like child s play, especially for serious casino players who take pride in their casino skills. However, the webcam feature came along, and serious casino players and beginners alike were finally given the chance they needed to access their much loved games anytime, anywhere, and with the real casino drama.

If you want to try playing at a live web cam casino, you can start by looking for an online casino that offers the live web cam feature. There are lots of these around, but you should choose wisely. Online casinos differ based on the casino software they use, and on the quality of their other services. When we say other services , here are the things you should check: deposit and payout methods, payout accuracy and security, game variety, and the additional bonuses and promotions that you can win. To help you choose the right casino to sign up with, you can visit review sites and read user testimonials to find the best online casino out there. Our most recommended by far are DublinBet.com and VegasRed.com, to name some.

YouTube Preview Image

Once you ve made your choice, you can simply create an account. Some casinos allow you to create a free account by just asking for a username, an e-mail address, and a password. Signing up will only take you a few seconds. However, when you are about to deposit money into your account, you will then be asked for more details. But until then, you can simply enjoy casino games for free and without any hassle. Some casinos, on the other hand, might ask you to fill up a rather extensive form upon initial registration so you can access the available games. After signing up, you can choose between fun play or real money mode. Some casinos do not offer the live games for free or fun play. But you can still access the live dealer games even without cash deposits with DublinBet s no-deposit games. If you choose to play for fun, you will be given fake credits, or a fun balance. You will use your fun balance to place your bets. At any point in the game, and with just one click of a button, you can easily shift from practice mode to real money mode.

But regardless of whether you re playing for fun or for real money, the web cam feature will definitely help intensify your casino experience by taking you deeper into the game, or by surrounding you with a casino ambiance. The web cam feature can also help you play better. The webcast, which involves both video and audio, will help stimulate your game performance and help you concentrate on winning your game. Since you can easily feel like you re in an actual casino, you will be inspired to go for the casino gold.

About the Author: Dan Roberts II comes up with informative articles about online casinos that feature

live roulette

and

best online casino

games as well as other conventional online casinos.

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=284320&ca=Recreation

Long Term Auto Loan: Understand The Pros &Amp; Cons Before Saying Yes}

Posted by:  :  Category: Risk Management

Click Here For More Specific Information On:

Submitted by: Jeffery Reynolds

Buying a car has never been more convenient. Today, cars are better built, technologically equipped and offer a variety of financing options. However, the scenario of expensive monthly payments and poor credit score become an unwanted hindrance. Opting for a long-term auto loan is one way to overcome the limiting obstacles. Typically, it ranges from six to eight years. However, before you choose a long-term auto loan, it is essential to evaluate the pros and cons of your decision.

Pros of a Long-term Auto Loan

1. Reduced Monthly Payments

As compared to a short-term loan, a long-term auto loan has smaller monthly payments. The total amount of the auto loan is spread over a longer time frame, thereby, significantly reducing the monthly payments. Due to a small monthly payment, you can afford to buy an upgraded version of the car as it is less burdensome to repay the loan.

2. Repair Damaged Credit

A long-term auto loan is extended to individuals with bad credit. If you make consistent payments throughout your term, you stand a chance to repair your damaged credit score. Additionally, the likelihood of obtaining refinancing for a long-term auto loan is higher than a short-term auto loan.

Cons of a Long-term Auto Loan

1. High Interest Rates

While the monthly payments are low, the interest rates on the long-term auto loans are high. A longer term period means increased number of payments with high interest rates. Therefore, you will not only be paying interest rates for a long time, but it will also be higher than other auto loan options.

2. Lower Resale Value

The depreciating rate of a car ranges between 15% and 20%. By the time you are done repaying a loan, the resale value of your car is likely to drop. As a car is a depreciating asset, the amount you receive after reselling it will be lower than its purchasing price. Therefore, a potential risk of upside down is always associated with a long-term auto loan.

So, when does it make Sense to choose a Long-term Auto Loan?

If you suffer from bad credit, chances are the dealer will offer you a loan which contains a long-term. Generally, individuals with a damaged credit score can obtain it easily as it requires less credit checks. Also, if you cannot afford expensive monthly payments, a long-term auto loan will help you to afford the car you wish to purchase.

A decision taken in a hurry is a decision low on evaluation. A bad credit score may limit your probability of getting an auto loan. However, a long-term auto loan can be a means to reach one step closer to purchasing your dream car. Understand the pros and cons before you decide on choosing a long-term auto loan.

It is never a good idea to rush into things, especially when considering a long-term auto loan. Obtaining a long-term auto loan has its own pros and cons. While the pros include reduced monthly payments and the opportunity to repair your damaged credit; the cons include high interest rates and a high probability of a lower resale value on your car.

About the Author: Want a long-term auto loan? Or looking for a bad credit auto loan that you can pay off in just a couple of months?

CarDestination.com

offers multiple auto financing options and enables you to choose the best deal. Get in touch with the bad credit auto loan expert. Ask for bad-credit zero down auto loans and enjoy buying a car without a down payment. For more information:https://www.cardestination.com/

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=1967370&ca=Finances }

U.S. Senators call for Idaho Senator Larry Craig to resign

Posted by:  :  Category: Uncategorized

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona, Republican Senator Norm Coleman of Minnesota, and Republican Representative Peter Hoekstra of Michigan are all calling for the resignation of Republican Senator Larry Craig of Idaho.

Senator McCain said, “My opinion is that when you plead guilty to a crime, you shouldn’t serve. That’s not a moral stand. That’s not a holier-than-thou. It’s just a factual situation.” And Senator Coleman said, “Senator Craig pled guilty to a crime involving conduct unbecoming a senator. He should resign.”

Craig has agreed to a temporary leadership reassignment according to a statement from the Senate’s Republican Leadership saying, “Senator Larry Craig has agreed to comply with Leadership’s request that he temporarily step down as the top Republican on the Veteran Affairs Committee, Appropriations Subcommittee on the Interior, and Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands and Forests. This is not a decision we take lightly but we believe this is in the best interest of the Senate until this situation is resolved by the Ethics Committee.”

Craig plead guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct after allegedly trying to initiate in a sexual experience with a male undercover law enforcement officer in a Minneapolis airport.

Meanwhile, Craig said, “I did nothing wrong.” Craig also said he plead guilty to a lesser charge in an effort to keep his arrest as quiet as possible. Craig said, “While I was not involved in any inappropriate conduct at the Minneapolis airport or anywhere else, I chose to plead guilty to a lesser charge in hopes of making it go away…It’s clear, though, that through my actions I have brought a cloud over Idaho. For that, I ask the people of Idaho for their forgiveness… I am not gay. I never have been gay”

Craig, 62, is in the middle of his third term and is seeking re-election next year.

Further developments to this story are available. See:
Republican leaders accused of double standard after Larry Craig’s resignation

Canada’s Toronto Centre (Ward 28) city council candidates speak

Posted by:  :  Category: Uncategorized

Saturday, November 4, 2006

On November 13, Toronto residents will be heading to the polls to vote for their ward’s councillor and for mayor. Among Toronto’s ridings is Toronto Centre (Ward 28). One candidate responded to Wikinews’ requests for an interview. This ward’s candidates include Howard Bortenstein, Holly Cartmell, Baquie Ghazi, Connie Harrison, Yaqoob Khan, Pam McConnell (incumbent), and Catherina Perez.

For more information on the election, read Toronto municipal election, 2006.

FIFA announce Russia to host 2018 World Cup, Qatar to host 2022 World Cup

Posted by:  :  Category: Uncategorized

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Football’s governing body, FIFA, today announced Russia is to host the 2018 World Cup, and Qatar is to host the 2022 World Cup. The decision was made by FIFA’s 22 executive members, who conducted a ballot in Zurich today. Russia beat England, Spain-Portugal and Holland-Belgium to host the event in 2018. The Qatar bid was picked ahead of the United States, Australia, Japan, and South Korea to stage the 2022 tournament.

Deputy Prime Minister of Russia Igor Shuvalov spoke briefly to react to his country’s victory. “You have entrusted us with the FIFA World Cup for 2018 and I can promise, we all can promise, you will never regret it. Let us make history together,” he said. Some analysts had suggested that Russia would not win the right to host the tournament, since Prime Minister Vladimir Putin had decided not to travel to Zurich, but remained in Moscow. FIFA President Sepp Blatter said of Russia: “I am sure that to organise the World Cup in that region, or that continent, it will do a lot of good for this part of the world.”

You have entrusted us with the FIFA World Cup for 2018 and I can promise, we all can promise, you will never regret it. Let us make history together

Russia captain Andrey Arshavin said he was “very, very happy” with the result. “It is going to have a huge impact in sports, in our economy, in the development of the country and even in politics. The influence of football in the world is huge. You can see that even today with the presentations and those who were making them,” he said. “It’s going to be the best World Cup in history because Russians are so hospitable. I hope it will change the way that Europe and the world view Russia—and hopefully change the opinion of Russian people too.”

Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, the ruling Emir of Qatar, praised FIFA for “believing in change”. Al Thani, who was in Zurich for the announcement, added: “We have worked very hard over past two years to get to this point. Today we celebrate, but tomorrow, the work begins. We acknowledge there is a lot of work for us to do, but we also stand by our promise that we will deliver.” Qatar urged FIFA to take “a bold gamble” by hosting the event in the Middle East for the first time. While only 1.7 million people live in Qatar, the bid representatives said that football is popular there. It was thought that there may be concerns that the extreme heat in Qatar would put the delegates off. Hassan Al-Thawadi, the chief executive of the bid, played down the fears. “We know it would be a bold gamble and an exciting prospect but with no risk,” he said. “Heat is not and will not be an issue.”

“Everyone is celebrating in the Middle East; everyone was behind us since the very beginning. They believed in us the whole way. And I’m so glad FIFA believed in us as well,” Al Thani added. “I’m speechless, but very proud and happy. I’m so proud that the Middle East was recognised by FIFA. We are so privileged to have a tournament like this coming to our region for the first time. It shows the value of FIFA and what it stands for as an organisation. As I promised, we will not let FIFA down. Everything we have promised until now will become a reality.” Speaking about why Qatar won the bid, he said: “What made us different is that we pushed the boundaries; we created new concepts, things which were not conventional but still very possible, very realistic for a country like ours. Therefore we are very proud to represent a new era, a new age for FIFA to look towards the future—the World Cup is for everyone.

There was disappointment in the countries which were beaten by Russia and Qatar. “Naturally we are hugely disappointed. At the same time we gave it our best shot,” said England ambassador Gary Lineker. “It was very well presented by our bid team. All you can do is wish Russia well and hope they have a really good World Cup but I wish it was us.” A journalist in Spain reported that there was “bitter disappointment here amongst Spanish fans,” and added that the economic crisis in the country may have been to blame. American supporters watching on large screens in Washington, D.C. were, when it was announced Qatar had won, “simply stunned—no booing or tears, but disbelief; and then a minute later, every face shows honest disappointment,” a BBC correspondent said.

The managing director for the Spain-Portugal joint bid, Miguel Angel Lopez, commented on losing out to Russia. “FIFA thought it was better to promote football in other latitudes and there we are,” he said. “The decision is focused on taking football to regions which have never held a World Cup.” Former Belgian footballer Marc Wilmots said: “Russia is a political choice and Qatar is an economic choice. You can say that to some extent the sport has been the loser with the decision for these two World Cups.”

We had heard people say our bid was too soon so it’s possible that was the reason. We knew it would be tough but it’s still a big disappointment.

Howard Stringer, Japan’s bid chairman and CEO of Sony said: “We had it in 2002—that was too big a mountain to climb. I was hoping we could get Japan another mission—the chance to do something spectacular in technology for society.” The vice-president of the Japan Football Association Kuniya Daini added: “We had heard people say our bid was too soon so it’s possible that was the reason. We knew it would be tough but it’s still a big disappointment. We have set a target of hosting the World Cup alone by 2050 so we will be bidding again.” The Australian Sports Minister Mark Arbib told local media: “We’re all pretty shattered over here. It was a bit unexpected because we thought we had run a first-class campaign to win. We did our best … unfortunately it wasn’t the case.”

Making the announcement, Blatter said: “We have had four bidders for 2018 and we can have only one winner. Three of the bidding associations must go home saying ‘what a pity’. But they must say football is not only by winning but football is also a school of life where you learn to lose. That’s not easy.” The 2010 World Cup was held earlier this year in South Africa, and Brazil will host the 2014 World Cup. When the bids for the 2018 and 2022 tournaments were announced in March 2009, Blatter praised the number of countries who wanted to host. “We are very pleased about the fantastic level of interest in our flagship competition, with all initial bidders confirming their candidature.”

10 Reasons To Recycle Your E Waste}

Posted by:  :  Category: Car Parts

Click Here For More Specific Information On:

Submitted by: Newbridge Services

Are you recycling your E waste?

If not, read the following reasons why you should be doing it:

1.Most of the e-waste in the world, that isnt processed through a certified electronics recycler, ends up in 3rd world countries. Many of these countries are not aware, or are incapable of addressing, the environmental issues caused by dumped e-waste.

2.Throwing away your offices old electronics into a dumpster leaves you extremely susceptible to information theft, even if you think youve deleted all your files on that broken computer, notebook, smartphone, PDA, or digital scanner. Choosing a certified recycler means your identity will be protected!

YouTube Preview Image

3.Job creation, specifically Green Job creation, is one of the wonderful bi-products of E-cycling. The skills required for many functions in the industry means that E-Cycling centers can often create environmentally-friendly jobs in disadvantaged communities.

4.Recycling metals from e?waste uses a fraction of the energy needed to mine new metals. Recycling 1 million cell phones can recover 50 pounds of gold, 550 pounds of silver, 20 pounds of palladium and 20,000 pounds of copper, according to the EPA. A ton of used cell phones (6,000 phones) yields $15,000 in precious metals.

5.Clearly, not enough of our electronics are being recycled, and recycled properly. Too many electronics are still being exported and dangerously disassembled. We all can do more to ensure they are recycled and their materials reused, so they dont contaminate the environment and cause health hazards.

6.Trash pollutes the environment generally. It contaminates the sea and the soil, it can be hazardous for bird and animal life, and it undermines local eco-systems.

7.Pollution is also caused by the transporting of e-waste to a transfer station and then often long distances to the landfill. The environmental damage continues as some unscrupulous waste managers circumvent local laws by transporting e-waste to undeveloped nations with archaic processing practices. Local release of toxins is inevitable, and many sites have been documented for increased local health problems due to the seepage of hazardous waste or from the unregulated open air incineration of this waste.

8.E-Recycling doesnt only prevent the toxic disposal of your electronics, but it also means a significant reduction in the amount of new materials, and therefore a reduced need to mine new ores to access the elements needed to create the materials!

9.Eliminating the risks of date loss and government fines are both great benefits, but e-recycling can even be profitable in some cases! Many corporations have found that their used electronics are not actually ready to be processed as e-waste as they still hold actual value! What may be considered obsolete to you may still be usable by others or in need of some simple upgrades or refurbishment to be made usable to others.

10.It is the right thing to do.

Most skip bin companies in Australia are well positioned in removing and disposing items in a quite efficient manner. The garbage you cannot throw in your council bin can easily fit into a skip bin, as these companies deliver bins of all sizes. The skip hire companies may help in reducing the amount of waste disposed in Australia, which counts up to 18 tons per year. However, they can also reduce your time and garbage disposal costs you spend on your local government removal.

About the Author: To buy hook lift bins Australia conveniently, place your orders online at

newbridgeservices.com.au/

. You may also contact New Bridge Services through the website contact page to know more about the varieties of skip bins available.

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=1965926&ca=Business }

Wikinews Shorts: April 23, 2008

Posted by:  :  Category: Uncategorized

A compilation of brief news reports for Wednesday, April 23, 2008.

An attack on a U.S. Marine checkpoint in the western Iraqi town of Ramadi saw two marines killed and an additional three wounded. The attack was carried out by a suicide bomber who detonated explosives in his vehicle at the checkpoint.

Sources


Following a weekend where Chicago saw 36 people shot, two stabbed, and a total of nine deaths, suspected gang crime continues to take a toll.

Today one person was shot dead in a suspected gang-related incident, and a teen wounded in a separate shooting.

Sources


There has been an underground explosion in Fort Lee, New Jersey. The explosion, which occurred at 15:30 yesterday (local time), resulted in an evacuation of several properties.

Sources


A gang in San Antonio chased a car on a busy street. The incident, which occurred on Monday, involved a gang which were carrying machine guns. San Antonio is a city located in the American state of Texas.

Sources


Sperm has allegedly been stolen from a sperm bank in Aurangabad, India. Two people have been arrested as a result. A local official said that “We are caught in a very difficult situation, as we do not know how many samples have been smuggled out of the laboratory.”

Sources


A US commander in Iraq today called for an end to violence in Iraq. He also asked Muqtada al-Sadr to use his influence to help end the violence in the country.

Sources


Bottle’s containing cat body parts have been found. Authorities are investigating the incident, which occurred in the US state of Arkansas. All the body parts were from kittens.

Sources


How To Reduce Debt Savings Right Under Your Nose

Posted by:  :  Category: Wealth Management

Click Here For More Specific Information On:

By Sue Young

Reduce debt, how can you possibly do that? Well one of the keys to reducing debt is to pay it off. Sounds obvious doesn’t it, but in reality this cunning debt reduction technique is hardly used. Now you’re probably thinking – ‘what the heck are you talking about?’ Well let me explain by telling a story, but this time we’ll get an imaginary person to be the poor sap in the story instead of having me – again. So meet Mary, a nice, hard working, average lady with a husband and two children.

Reduce Debt – Reduce Debt – Am I making My Point

So here’s Mary, does she have any debts, yes she does. She has a $2000 credit card with a balance of $1000, she has some other debts but we won’t worry about them right now. Mary is very uncomfortable with the debt she has and would love to reduce that debt as quickly as possible. The payments eat her income and keep her awake with worry at the end of every month. How can she possibly think about reducing her debts with all of this worry going on?

Let’s switch gears here for a moment and take a closer look at one of these debts, Mary’s’ credit card. What is it exactly? Is it money? No it isn’t. Is it cash in Mary’s pocket? No it isn’t. Is it a free loan that Mary never has to pay back? No it isn’t? Are we agreed on all the no’s? If we are agreed, the question remains, what is it?

YouTube Preview Image

Redue Debt – Reduce Debt – I’m Trying Again

Well the answer is quite simple. A credit card is a loan that attracts interest (and boy does it do that) and it must be paid back. It lures Mary into spending money that she doesn’t have, the buy now and pay later plan. Mary could avoid the interest on her loan as long as she pays the total outstanding amount each month, but does she. No she doesn’t, it’s way too much for her to afford to pay in one lump – so why the heck did she spend it in the first place?? Because it’s so easy that’s why, and because there are so many shops, and so much pressure to have this, that and the other thing, but that’s another story, this is about Mary reducing her debts by using something right under her nose.

So how has she got into this mess. Is she some kind of obsessive shopper who can’t stop herself? Does she have an alcohol habit she is feeding. No, none of that, she’s just a regular wife and mother doing her best. Unfortunately she has picked up some bad habits along the way and the credit card is one of them.

The fact is, the banks want Mary to use the card, they want her to take it out to the maximum limit and then make the minimum payment, which will be 3-5% of the balance. And they want her to roll the rest over to the next month. That’s how they make their profits, and fair enough, they need to make a profit to stay in business. But Mary needs to be smart and keep herself in profit, not the bank.

But it’s not the interest that I want to focus on, although that can be a considerable saving when trying to reduce debt. There’s a bigger fish to hook here and it’s simply this. Reduce debt by not creating any more. That’s right, stop using that darned card. Those credit cards are not money. Every time Mary gets it out of her purse to use it, she is spending money she doesn’t have. She is living beyond her means, and she is potentially creating a debt that could take her years to pay off. Those purchases of $100 here and there which attract on average 20% interest and are rolled over month after month, and added to month after month, grow and grow. Debt reduction doesn’t even get a look in.

Let’s get back to Mary. She like many of us, has been lured into thinking that she needs a credit card to manage, but she doesn’t. These cards haven’t been around forever and people managed very well without them way back when. I think they used something called ‘cash’. They spent money they had, not money they were going to get. Of course there has always been time payment, but the proliferation of credit cards has exploded the misery of debt world wide. Mary is part of this misery and it’s up to her to stop using her credit card, her store card and any other type of card she might have. Are you listening Mary?

So back to my original point. One of the ways to reduce debt is to pay it off. You bet, by throwing the card away you will stop creating more debt and will actually be able to pay it off. Mary sincerely wants to reduce debt but has internalized the habit of seeing her credit card as a necessity, it is not a necessity. Reducing debt is a necessity.

So to summarize this long tale of Mary and her debt reduction plans, Mary needs to stop using her cards to live on, live within her means, and pay down the outstanding balance as fast as she can. How cunning is that? Give it some thought. Good Luck.

About the Author: Sue Young of income-while-you-sleep.com has coached many people in the skills of ‘How To Reduce Debt’, she knows that increasing income packs a powerful punch in this process. To learn how you can earn 5 separate income streams visit

Income While You Sleep

, and to find out more about debt free living visit

Kill Debt Now

.

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=281714&ca=Finances

Four British energy suppliers face investigation into claims of misselling

Posted by:  :  Category: Uncategorized

Sunday, September 5, 2010

The Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem), the regulator of the electricity and gas markets in Great Britain, has launched an investigation into four of the largest British energy suppliers over suspicions that they not be complying with face-to-face and telephone sales regulations. The four organisations facing scrutiny could be fined up to 10% of their annual turnover if it is found that they are breaking sales regulations. Scottish Power, npower, Scottish and Southern Energy and EDF Energy are all to face questioning by the organisation.

Ofgem has urged customers of the four companies to alert the energy regulator, “if they are concerned about the sales approach any domestic suppliers have taken when selling energy contracts, either face-to-face or by telephone,” according to a statement. “As part of the investigation process Ofgem will examine any evidence of non-compliance and consider whether there are grounds for exercising enforcement powers.”

New regulations on sales tactics by energy suppliers were recently introduced, and, Ofgem has said, energy suppliers must be “proactive in preventing misselling to customers both face to face and over the phone. Also, if suppliers are selling contracts face to face they must provide customers with an estimate before any sales are concluded. In most circumstances customers should also receive a comparison of the supplier’s offer with their current deal.” Only one in five consumers consider energy suppliers to be trustworthy, and 61% of people feel intimidated by doorstep sales people from energy companies. According to the organisation Consumer Focus, “complaints have declined since new rules came into effect this year, but suppliers still seem to be flouting the rules. Some customers are still being given misleading quotes and information, which leave them worse off when they switch provider.”

The newspaper The Guardian has reported that “householders are reporting that sales agents working for the energy suppliers are giving them misleading information and quotes which leave them worse off when they switch supplier.” Consumer Focus has said that if energy companies continue to break the rules, they could be banned from doorstep-selling completely. The report goes on to say that “new figures from helpline Consumer Direct show that while the number of complaints has fallen since last year, about 200 cases of mis-selling are being reported each month.” However, Scottish Power said it insists on “the highest standards possible for all of our sales agents”, and npower told the Financial Times that it was “confident that the processes we have in place mean that we comply with our regulatory obligations”. EDF added that it was “fully compliant with all obligations regarding sales of energy contracts”.

According to the regulator, the obligations are serious and must be followed by energy supplies, or they will face “tougher sanctions than those available under more general consumer protection law.” Ofgem has published a guide advising consumers what they should do should an energy salesperson contact them in person of by telephone. Improper sales tactics are still common in the industry—in 2008 an Ofgem investigation found that 48% of gas customers and 42% of electricity customers were worse off after switching supplier on the doorstep. Npower was fined £1.8 million in 2008 by the organisation, and Ofgem insists that they are “committed to taking action” over improper sales activities by energy companies. “Suppliers have existing obligations to detect and prevent misselling and new licence conditions were brought in following our probe to further increase protection for customers,” said Andrew Wright, a Senior Partner of the regulator. “We expect all suppliers to comply with these tougher obligations but if our investigations find otherwise we will take strong action.”

HAVE YOUR SAY
What are your experiences with doorstep salespeople? If they persuaded you to change energy providers, were you worse off as a result?
Add or view comments

Head of energy at Consumer Focus, Audrey Gallacher, called the investigation “a welcome step … to address years of customers getting a bad deal on energy prices on their doorstep. While many doorstep sales people will do a good job, the pay and rewards system continues to encourage mis-selling, despite years of regulation and voluntary initiatives. If better advice for customers and enforcement of the tougher rules doesn’t end the flagrant abuse of this form of selling the big question will be whether it should be completely banned.” Christine McGourty, director of Energy UK, which represents the leading gas and electricity companies, said that “the companies involved will collaborate with the Ofgem investigation and are awaiting further details from the regulator. Any sales agent in breach of the code will be struck off the approved energy sales register.” Which? chief executive, Peter Vicary-Smith, has said he considers the situation “shocking”, saying that the investigation “will do nothing to improve consumer trust in energy suppliers. We’re pleased that Ofgem has promised tough measures against any firms guilty of mis-selling. We hope it uses this opportunity to tighten rules around telesales so they are in line with those for face to face sales.”

SNP Westminster Energy spokesperson Mike Weir MP, however, said that the investigation “does nothing to tackle the real problem of fuel prices which leave many Scots facing great difficulty in heating their homes … Rather than tinkering around the edges Ofgem should be looking at how to reduce prices for vulnerable households.” Gareth Kloet, Head of Utilities at Confused.com, one of the UK’s biggest and most popular price comparison services, also welcomed the inquiry. “It is unacceptable for energy companies to mislead customers like this,” he said, adding that Confused.com has previously “urged energy providers to either stop the practice of doorstep selling or make it very clear to households that better deals are available online. There is no reason why door-to-door salesmen can’t show people online deals and even help households switch to them.”

“Our research reveals customers could end up paying £167 more than they need to as door-to-door salesmen are unable to offer the discounts that are applied online. The changes that have been made to date are a welcome addition to safeguard customers; however this review has been much needed for a long time. Hopefully it will mark the end of customers being overcharged and missold,” Kloet continued. “Our message to energy consumers remains the same: they should shop around online to make sure they’re getting the best deal possible and turn these salesmen away.”

Canada’s Scarborough-Agincourt (Ward 39) city council candidates speak

Posted by:  :  Category: Uncategorized
This exclusive interview features first-hand journalism by a Wikinews reporter. See the collaboration page for more details.

Friday, November 3, 2006

On November 13, Torontonians will be heading to the polls to vote for their ward’s councillor and for mayor. Among Toronto’s ridings is Scarborough-Agincourt (Ward 39). Two candidates responded to Wikinews’ requests for an interview. This ward’s candidates include Wayne Cook, Mike Del Grande (incumbent), Samuel Kung, Lushan Lu, Sunshine Smith, and John Wong.

For more information on the election, read Toronto municipal election, 2006.